盈彩网开户 - 盈彩网登录
盈彩网返点2023-01-31 16:05

盈彩网开户

中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

  中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图:日本福岛第一核电站。

  2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

  日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

  日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

  事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。

  因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。

  日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

  《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

  德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

  日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

  国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。

  太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。

  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

  By John Lee

  (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

  Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

  The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

  On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

  The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

  In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

  Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

  The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

  The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

  The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

  According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

  As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

  However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

  Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

  The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

  If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.

 

  • 唱歌、弹琴、“跳火圈” 选战把台政客逼成“才艺明星”******

      【环球时报综合报道】台湾地区的选战日趋白热化,甚至逼得参选人不得不“能歌善舞”,拼命与民众拉近距离。因为,出席活动上台高歌,不仅能炒热气氛,更是博感情的最佳方法之一。

      据台湾舆情网站“网络温度计”1日报道,通过数据分析统计,近一年10名最被岛内民众讨论“爱唱歌的政治人物”,结果第一名为前“卫生福利部部长”陈时中。2021年11月,岛内网络曾流传一段视频,画面中陈时中未戴口罩喝酒唱歌,后来又流出第二个视频,显示陈时中在三级警戒期间依旧“脱口罩高歌”,引发巨大争议。而闽南语歌手詹雅雯2020年举办小巨蛋演唱会时,也邀请陈时中同台飙歌;陈时中2022年竞选台北市长的后援会成立时,两人再度同台合唱。

      排名第二的是民进党“立委”高嘉瑜。2022年10月,她南下嘉义助选连唱3首。排在第三的是前台北市长柯文哲,2022年3月他与前台北市副市长黄珊珊被爆在公共场合摘下口罩开唱,因违反防疫规范而受罚。去年12月底卸任前,柯文哲在台上高歌《囚鸟》,更笑说“不用当市长可以自由了”。今年1月,台北内湖科学园区岁末联欢晚会,柯文哲与高嘉瑜和台北市长蒋万安同场飙歌。

      前高雄市长韩国瑜排在第四,2018年他参选高雄市长造成一股“韩流”席卷全台,只要是韩国瑜的竞选场合,支持者都会大唱《夜袭》,意外让这首军歌爆红。第五名是台北市议员徐巧芯,她曾在去年11月参加时任国民党台南市长候选人谢龙介募款餐会时,演唱王心凌的《爱你》。

      台北市长蒋万安名列第六,去年10月他发布竞选主题曲《无限·台北》,希望唤醒不同世代台北人的光荣感。高雄市长陈其迈排名第九,喜欢唱《红豆》,不过经常跑调。歌手出身的“立委”林昶佐列第十,他当选后反而很少以歌手身份表演,大多是竞选时与选民唱歌互动累积人气。

      针对这份排名,蒋万安1日回应称,“谢谢网友评分”,他平常没有很多机会在现场唱歌,“大家可以多多提供歌单,让我多多练习”。徐巧芯表示不服气仅排第五,认为自己应该得第一,“不过没关系,2024选举过程中,大家还是可以持续看到我表现的机会”。

      除了唱歌外,岛内政客还经常表演其他才艺。比如在民进党举办的募款餐会上,台北市议员王世坚曾表演拉小提琴,还有“立委”陈莹弹钢琴。2015年12月,新北市第四选区国民党“立委”参选人陈茂嘉,当众表演了绝技“跳火圈”,表明自己坚定的参选决心。能成功表演这些绝活,要归功于陈茂嘉的科班出身——30多年前,他曾入选小学体操队,保留节目还有翻跟头和劈叉。今年1月,有岛内网民在社交平台询问,“想到运动/才艺会联想到什么政治人物?”结果不少人回复说,王世坚的小提琴和马英九的游泳。

      不过,台湾政客表演才艺,也经常引起争议。如“网络温度计”排名第七的新竹市长高虹安2019年与主持人朱学恒高唱《塔绿班之歌》,因唱出“绿畜”一词引发争议。2022年年底,高嘉瑜点评徐巧芯唱《爱你》的音色音准都不如她,同时还大跳《爱你》的舞步,隔空较劲意味浓厚。徐巧芯随即在脸书喊话,邀请高嘉瑜挑战天后张惠妹的《三天三夜》,有网民评论称“我们要看到血流成河”。

      台湾东海大学地方自治研究中心执行长潘兆民表示,岛内政治人物没有热度的话,选民对其印象就不深,甚至记不住名字,要在选战中获胜恐有难度。因此,通过各种方法拉抬人气,争取曝光机会,无论是出席活动还是上台唱歌,都是让选民记住自己的方法,而唱歌明显可以带动现场气氛。不过也有分析称,政客这些做法只是为了选举,吸引选民关注,但说到底还是扎实的施政能让民众安心。(张若)

    中国网客户端

    国家重点新闻网站,9语种权威发布

    盈彩网地图